What is Conjoint Analysis?

Risk and RewardConjoint Analysis is used when a brand wants to know how important different elements of a decision are. We know from neuroscience that people (people like you and me) cannot put numeric values to how important is, say, flying direct versus flying on your preferred airline. But brands need numeric values when they seek to maximise revenue, profit, customer choice and satisfaction.

Consider an organisation producing tablets, perhaps a competitor to the Apple iPad and Samsung Galaxy. The organisation needs to understand how different customers value Attributes such as Size, Brand, Price, and Battery Length. Armed with this information they can create their product range and offering.

Conjoint Analysis seeks to assign values to these product Attributes and Levels by creating realistic choices and asking people to evaluate them. Maths are then used to calculate what the underlying values are.

Example
In the case of Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis (currently the most popular form of Conjoint Analysis) participants are shown a series of options, like the one below, and asked to select the one they would be most likely to buy.

Choice Table

Choice-Based Conjoint asks people to pick the option they would be most likely to buy, other forms of Conjoint Analysis ask people to rank or rate options. Choices are widely considered to be more realistic than asking people to rank options or to rate them.

Each participant is shown several of these choices and the answers they give allow us to work out the underlying values. For example, we can work out what their preferred size is, and how much they would pay for their preferred brand. Once we have the values for each of the Attributes (e.g. brand, size, battery length etc) and for each of the Levels of each Attribute (e.g. Apple iPad, Samsung Galaxy, Sony Xperia & Nexus) there is a range of analytic options. The key tools for analysis include: What-if modelling, forecasting, segmentation, and applying cost-benefit analyses.

When and How to use Conjoint Analysis
Not all research problems can be tackled with Conjoint Analysis. Conjoint works best when the value of a product can be approximated by the sum of its parts, such as mobile phones, cars, computers, ski holidays, and financial product. Conjoint works less well with emotional variables or interacting combinations, such as advertising messages or food combinations.

To conduct a Conjoint Analysis project you need: access to suitable software (to design and analyse the questions) and a design that meets the rules for conjoint analysis (e.g. covering the important Attributes, proper rotation of the question elements, and avoiding interactions).

Conjoin Analysis requires more preparation than most forms of quantitative market research and the analysis takes longer – which tends to make the whole project slower and more expensive than a simple quantitative test. Conjoint Analysis is used when simpler/cheaper options are unlikely to provide a useful outcome.

Want to find out more?
If you’d like to find out more about Conjoint Analysis then join our upcoming webinar. On 22 June QuestionPro is hosting a webinar “A Beginners Guide to Choice-based Conjoint Analysis” with Paul Richard McCullough and me (Ray Poynter). Click here if you would like to attend the webinar or to find out more about the webinar.

2 thoughts on “What is Conjoint Analysis?

  1. Thank you for an informative webinar!
    If I may ask a question: is CBC useful when comparing three or four brands all with static attributes and only the target brand’s price attribute changing? or do you recommend a different technique?

  2. Hi, this problem is more of a Brand Price TradeOff situation (BPTO). The main problem is that the task seems very unreal to the respondent very quickly. One thing you can try if you are using conjoint is to add a couple of levels, for example a bonus size offer for each product (10% and 20% extra free), or a BOGOF (buy one get one free), and if possible vary the packaging or something to create something that is less a fixed product and price.

Comments are closed.